CANADA CONSTITUTION REHABILITATION AS INITIATED THROUGH THE TWO ROW WAMPUM COVENANT SILVER CHAIN HONOURS
28TH SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST 2020 A.D.E.
1. The
Doctrine Of Extinguishment : Is Generally Defined As Being : “… the destruction of a right or contract.[1] If
the subject of the contract is destroyed (such as through merging the contract
subject and the contract obligation), then the contract may be made void.[1] Extinguishment
occurs in a variety of contracts, such as land contracts (common, copyhold),
debts, rents, and right of ways.[1] A
right may be extinguished by nullifying that right or, in the case of a debt,
discharged by payment in full or through settlement.[2] An extinguishment may be by matter of fact and
by matter of law.[1] If
a creditor receives
satisfaction and full payment of a debt and the creditor releases the debtor,
then that is express extinguishment by matter of fact.[1] If
a person is renting land and subsequently becomes the owner of that same land
by purchase or descent, the rent is extinguished through implied extinguishment
by matter of fact.[1]” WKPD
2. Piracy
: Is The Act Of “… robbery or criminal violence by ship or boat-borne attackers upon another ship or a
coastal area, typically with the goal of stealing cargo and other valuable
items or properties. Those who engage in acts of piracy are called pirates …While the term
can include acts committed in the air, on land (especially across national borders or in
connection with taking over and robbing a car or train), or in other major bodies of water or on a shore, in cyberspace, as well as the fictional possibility of space piracy, it
generally refers to maritime piracy.” WKPD
3. Alien
Hostile Military Occupancy : Is The Act Of “…The rules of occupation are
delineated in various international agreements, primarily the Hague Convention
of 1907, the Geneva
Conventions of 1949, as well as established state practice. The
relevant international conventions, the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
Commentaries, and other treaties by military scholars provide guidelines on
such topics as rights and duties of the occupying power, protection of civilians, treatment of prisoners of war, coordination of relief efforts, issuance of travel documents, property rights of the populace, handling of cultural and
art objects, management of refugees, and other concerns which are very important both before and
after the cessation of hostilities. A country that establishes an occupation
and violates internationally agreed upon norms runs the risk of censure, criticism, or condemnation. In the current era, the practices of
occupations have largely become a part of customary
international law, and form a part
of the laws of war. “ : WKPD : PDF
4. Ancestral
Homeland : “… An ancestral home is the place of origin of one's extended family,
particularly the home owned and preserved by the same family for several generations.[citation
needed] The term can refer to an individual house or estate, or
to a broader geographic area such as a town, a region, or an entire country. In
the latter cases, the phrase ancestral homeland might be used.[1] In particular, the concept of a diaspora requires the concept of an ancestral home from which
the diaspora emanates.[2]” WKPD
5. Doctrine Of Discovery
: European Colonial Powers : “… is a concept of public international law expounded by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, most notably Johnson v. M'Intosh in 1823. Chief Justice John
Marshall explained and applied the way that colonial
powers laid claim to lands belonging to foreign sovereign
nations during the Age
of Discovery. Under it, title to lands lay with the government whose subjects
travelled to and occupied a territory whose inhabitants were not subjects of a
European Christian monarch. The doctrine has been primarily used to support
decisions invalidating or ignoring aboriginal possession of land in favor of colonial or
post-colonial governments.
… The Doctrine of Discovery was promulgated by
European monarchies in order to legitimize the colonization of lands outside of
Europe. Between the mid-fifteenth century and the mid-twentieth century, this
idea allowed European entities to seize lands inhabited by indigenous
peoples under the guise of discovery.[3] In 1494, the Treaty of Tordesillas declared
that only non-Christian lands could be colonized under the Doctrine of
Discovery.
In
1792, U.S. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson declared that the
Doctrine of Discovery would extend from Europe to the infant U.S. government.
The Doctrine and its legacy continue to influence American imperialism and
treatment of indigenous peoples.[4] … Johnson v. M'Intosh :The plaintiff Johnson
had inherited land, originally purchased from the Piankeshaw tribes.
Defendant McIntosh claimed the same land, having purchased it under a grant
from the United States. It appears that in 1775 members of the Piankeshaw tribe
sold certain land in the Indiana
Territory to Lord Dunmore,
royal governor of Virginia and others. In 1805 the Piankeshaw conveyed much of
the same land to William Henry Harrison, governor of the Indiana
Territory, thus giving rise to conflicting claims of title.[5] In
reviewing whether the courts of the United States should recognize land titles
obtained from Native Americans prior to American independence, the court
decided that they should not … Legal critique[edit]
As the Piankeshaw were not party to the litigation, "no
Indian voices were heard in a case which had, and continues to have, profound
effects on Indian property rights."[10]
Professor Blake A. Watson of the University of Dayton School of
Law finds Marshall's claim of "universal recognition" of the
"doctrine of discovery" historically inaccurate.
In
reviewing the history of European exploration Marshall did not take note of Spanish
Dominican philosopher Francisco de Vitoria's
1532 De Indis nor De Jure belli Hispanorum in barbaros.
Vitoria adopted from Thomas Aquinas the
Roman law concept of ius gentium, and concluded that the Indians
were rightful owners of their property and that their chiefs validly exercised
jurisdiction over their tribes, a position held previously by Palacios
Rubios. His defense of American Indians was based on a scholastic
understanding of the intrinsic dignity of man, a dignity he found being
violated by Spain's policies in the New World [11]
Contemporary advocacy efforts Discovery doctrine has been severely
condemned as socially unjust, racist, and in violation of basic and fundamental
human rights.[12] The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)
noted the Doctrine of Discovery "as the foundation of the violation of
their (Indigenous people) human rights".[6] The eleventh session of the
UNPFII, held at the UN's New York headquarters from 7-18 May 2012, had the
special theme of "“The Doctrine of Discovery: its enduring impact on
indigenous peoples and the right to redress for past conquests (articles 28 and
37 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples)," [13] and called for a mechanism to
investigate historical land claims, with speakers observing that "The
Doctrine of Discovery had been used for centuries to expropriate indigenous
lands and facilitate their transfer to colonizing or dominating nations...."[14]” WKPD
6. Natural
Law & The Law Of Nations : “The ius gentium or jus
gentium (Latin for "law of nations") is a concept of international law within the ancient Roman
legal system and Western law traditions based on or influenced by it. The ius
gentium is not a body of statute law or a legal code,[1] but rather customary law thought to be held in common by all gentes ("peoples"
or "nations") in "reasoned compliance with standards of
international conduct"[2] … PDF
: WKPD
7. Customary Law : “A legal custom is the established pattern of behavior
that can be objectively verified within a particular social setting. A claim
can be carried out in defense of "what has always been done and accepted
by law". Related is the idea of prescription; a right enjoyed through
long custom rather than positive law.[1]
Customary law (also, consuetudinary or unofficial
law) exists where:
1.
a certain legal practice
is observed and
2.
the relevant actors
consider it to be law (opinio juris).
Most customary laws deal with standards of community that
have been long-established in a given locale. However the term can also apply
to areas of international law where certain standards
have been nearly universal in their acceptance as correct
bases of action – for example, laws against piracy or slavery (see hostis humani generis). In many, though not
all instances, customary laws will have supportive court rulings and case law
that has evolved over time to give additional weight to their rule as law and
also to demonstrate the trajectory of evolution (if any) in the interpretation
of such law by relevant courts.”
… In international law, customary law refers to the Law of Nations or the legal norms that have developed through the customary exchanges between states over time, whether based on diplomacy or aggression. Essentially, legal obligations are believed to arise between states to carry out their affairs consistently with past accepted conduct. These customs can also change based on the acceptance or rejection by states of particular acts. Some principles of customary law have achieved the force of peremptory norms, which cannot be violated or altered except by a norm of comparable strength. These norms are said to gain their strength from universal acceptance, such as the prohibitions against genocide and slavery. Customary international law can be distinguished from treaty law, which consists of explicit agreements between nations to assume obligations. However, many treaties are attempts to codify pre-
existing customary law. “” WKPD
… In international law, customary law refers to the Law of Nations or the legal norms that have developed through the customary exchanges between states over time, whether based on diplomacy or aggression. Essentially, legal obligations are believed to arise between states to carry out their affairs consistently with past accepted conduct. These customs can also change based on the acceptance or rejection by states of particular acts. Some principles of customary law have achieved the force of peremptory norms, which cannot be violated or altered except by a norm of comparable strength. These norms are said to gain their strength from universal acceptance, such as the prohibitions against genocide and slavery. Customary international law can be distinguished from treaty law, which consists of explicit agreements between nations to assume obligations. However, many treaties are attempts to codify pre-
existing customary law. “” WKPD
8. Consecutively
Settled Sovereign Peoples : The Prerequisite Of CSSP
Endorsement Of The North American Trade Agreements Between Canada – United State
– Mexico Is A Fundamental Matter Of Human, Civil And Political Rights. And, The
Credentials Challenges By The CSSP At The United Nations In 2013 Is Percolating
Toward A Conclusion; Where, CSSP Are Entitled To Petition To The International
Criminal Court (ICC) For A Declaration Of Paramountcy As Based Upon Original
Ancestral Homeland Rights.
9. In
Summation : In 1095 Pope Urban II Declared The Papal
Bull “Terra
Nullius” (a decree explaining the policy of
the Catholic Church about empty land. This decree gave European kings the right
to "discover" and claim land in non-Christian areas) To Secure The Dominant Role Of The
Catholic Church Throughout The World – Which Was Followed Up By The 1454 Romanus
Pontifex & 1493
Inter Caetera Papal
Bulls Of Instruction
To The Monarchies Of Europe On Matters Of Explorations Into New Lands. This
Was, Certainly, Not The Spirit Of Peace That Was The Foundation Of The Church. Certainly,
A Wiser World Exists Today; Where Disparate Parties (As In Canada’s Ancestral
Political Life) Can Genuinely Rehabilitate The Political Stream By Re-Visiting
The Two Row Wampum Silver Covenant Chain … And, Within This Environment Of The
Tree Of Life Peace Trust Friendship, There Can Occur A Thrust Forward To
Structure A Political Framework That Establishes Sincere Recognition Of The Words
Of Albert Einstein In 1947; Where He Recommended That Peace In The World
Could Arise – Like The Sun Each Day –
With A Global Political Framework [The SupraNational
Organization : SGO] That Can Lead Humanity Into The Just Society. It Would
Be Commendable For All Peoples Of “Canada” To Demonstrate This As Being A
Reality By Abandoning The Constitutional Monarchy [With Its Dark History] And
Embracing A Renewed Political Model That Adopts Legitimate Historical Ancestral
Presence With The New Settlements. It IS
Time To Move Beyond Canada’s INDIAN
ACT.
ICE : INDIGENOUS COUNCIL OF ELDERS : ICE
6. STEP SIX : ICE SGO Establishes Global Trade Agreements
1. STEP ONE : Transfer Indian Trust Fund To Blocked SGO
7. STEP SEVEN : ICE SGO Establishes Just Society Indigenous
2. STEP TWO : Eliminate Indian Act Through Equitable Settlement
8. STEP EIGHT : ICE SGO Influences Other Nations To Adopt
3. STEP THREE : Install New Turtle Island Canada Constitution ICE
9. STEP NINE : ICE SGO INTL ASSEMBLY @ United Nations
4. STEP FOUR : Co-ordinate Constitution Change With UN GA
5. STEP FIVE : ICE Is Recognized As SupraNational Organization
10. STEP TEN : SGO Just Society Arises As New Economic Theory
AUTHORIZED BY : DR. STITUMAATULWUT HWUNEEM : KWA'MUTSUN
RESPECTFULLY PUBLISHED BY : RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN : IGO AMBASSADOR-at-LARGE XXII
Private 1 250 709 1809 Mobile
POPULATION CLOCK : DEBT CLOCKS : DOOMSDAY : CLIMATE CLOCK : POVERTY CLOCK
CORRUPTION WATCH UK : SIPRI : TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL : OATH : TWITTER ACCOUNTS : SIPRI : PRESS CONTACTS : CSSP BUSINESS : CENTRES : MEDIA CONTACTS : CANADA HOUSE OF COMMONS MEMBERS : CANADA SENATE MEMBERS :UNITED NATIONS MEMBER STATES : UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL : STATS CAN POPULATION CLOCK
INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND ORGANIZATIONS : GDP BY COUNTRY : CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX
WITHOUT PREJUDICE : NOT LEGAL ADVICE; NOR, A DIRECTIVE TO LEGAL COUNSEL. POLITICAL COMMENTARIES ONLY : ERRORS AND OMISSIONS EXCEPTED
FEB 28TH SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST 2020 A.D.E.
- 30 -
- 30 -
